New survey of 4,000 parents and children in the U.S. and Australia reveals sharp generational divides in support, fears, mental health expectations, and belief in government enforcement.

WASHINGTON, DC / ACCESS Newswire / December 9, 2025 / The Family Online Safety Institute (FOSI) released new research today examining how parents and children in the United States and Australia view social media bans for anyone under 16. The findings reveal strong parental support for such bans, in contrast with widespread concern from children who fear losing friendships and support systems that exist primarily online.

The research arrives as Australia implements a national under 16 social media ban, placing global attention on how the policy will affect youth and their families. FOSI's study surveyed 4,000 parents and children ages 10 to 17 to understand how both groups feel about restrictions, enforcement, and the broader impact of social media on daily life.

Support for the Ban: Parents vs Children

Parents Support the Ban

65% of Australian parents support a national under 16 ban
58% of U.S. parents support it

Children Do Not

Only 38% of Australian children support a ban
Only 36% of U.S. children support it

Children, who are most directly affected by the restrictions, are less likely to support them. This gap raises a central question for policymakers. Why do parents and children view the potential impact so differently, and what might be lost if children's concerns are overlooked?

Connection Concerns: Children Feel the Most at Risk

Children Fear Losing Essential Connections

53% of U.S. children fear a ban would disconnect them from important cause them to lose connections and support
56% of Australian children feel the same

Parents Show Lower Concern

35% of U.S. parents
36% of Australian parents

For many children, social media can play a meaningful role in their daily lives, offering a place to stay connected, share experiences, and feel part of a wider community. Losing access to those spaces raises important questions about how young people will continue nurturing the relationships and support system they rely on. This cultural context along with the findings above highlights an emotional dimension of the ban that many parents may underestimate.

Families are divided on the mental health impact of a ban

Some parents support a ban because they hope it will protect children's mental health. However, parents and children disagree on whether this will actually happen. A total of 52% of U.S. parents and 42% of Australian parents agree that a ban will help protect the mental health and well-being of children. Children are less convinced, as only 43% of U.S. and 33% of Australian children hold this view. These mixed views show that families see the mental health conversation as complicated and deeply personal.

Screen Time Reduction is Expected but Not Guaranteed

Parents and children share similar beliefs about whether a social media ban would reduce overall screen time. A total of 55% of U.S. parents and 47% of Australian parents believe screen time would decrease, and nearly half of children in both countries agree. While reducing screen time is one of the most common arguments for the ban, it is important to note that not all screen time is equal. Many children use social media not only for entertainment, but for communication, schoolwork, creativity, and support. Additionally, many children, 64% in the U.S. and 59% in Australia, say they would spend more time on other digital platforms, including video games or text messaging, indicating the total screen time may remain the same.

Many believe kids will find a way around the ban

Parents and children are closely aligned when it comes to one concern. More than half of parents believe that children will find ways to circumvent the new restrictions. In the United States, 53% and in Australia, 54% of parents believe their children could work around the ban. When it comes to children ages 10 to 15 (those affected by the Australian ban), 45% of Australian children and 53% of U.S. children claim they could find a way around a ban.

These findings reflect a common perception that tech-savvy teens will find ways to bypass age restrictions if motivated to do so.

High support for teen accounts

One of the strongest areas of consensus across all four groups is the idea of creating special teen accounts with stronger protections and guardrails. A total of 77% of U.S. parents, 74% of Australian parents, 80% of U.S. children, and 77 % of Australian children support this approach. These findings suggest that families are looking for solutions that prioritize safety without removing social media altogether. The strong support for teen accounts indicates that both parents and children prefer safer, age-appropriate options rather than an outright ban.

"Children will be the most affected by this ban, yet only one third support it," says Alanna Powers O'Brien, Director of Research and Education at FOSI. "Many are worried about losing friendships and support they rely on every day. Their concerns should not be overlooked. As policies evolve, it is important that we listen to how young people experience the online world and ensure they feel informed, supported, and included in these conversations."

For more information and to download the Children and Parents' Perceptions of Social Media and Classroom Smartphone Bans in the U.S. and Australia

About the Family Online Safety Institute

The Family Online Safety Institute is an international nonprofit organization dedicated to making the online world safer for children and families. Through research, education, resources, and collaboration with industry, government, and civil society, FOSI promotes responsible digital parenting and healthier online experiences for all.

This data was collected by Ipsos, the third largest market research company in the world, present in 90 markets and employing more than 18,000 people. The survey involved 4,000 respondents, evenly split between the United States and Australia, including 1,000 parents and 1,000 children aged 10-17 in each country. Participants qualified if they or their children used the internet for at least three hours weekly. This survey was conducted from October 2nd to October 20th, 2025. No post-hoc weights were applied to this study, and the findings reflect the opinion of survey respondents only.

This research is supported by Disney's Digital Wellness Grant Program and TikTok.

###

Media Contact:
Family Online Safety Institute (FOSI)
Amy Bartko
amy@fosi.org | www.fosi.org | 480-201-6733

SOURCE: FOSI

View the original press release on ACCESS Newswire

Logo

Tags

More Like This

Parents Are Underestimating Their Kids' Digital Lives - Especially With AI: New Family Online Safety Institute Research

Social media to be banned for under-16s in landmark government move to give kids their childhood back

From naughty step to WiFi blackout: modern parents turn to tech restrictions as the digital era’s ‘naughty step’

New social media curfews and crackdown on addictive features to better protect 16- and 17-year-olds online

Social Media Ban in Australia: What Online Casinos Can Learn on Responsible Gambling Practices? - Insights from CasinoAus

Family Online Safety Institute Hosts 2026 European Forum in Brussels, Convening Global Leaders to Find Common Ground on Online Safety

What's changing for children on social media from 25 July 2025

70% of teens see real-life violence on social media